#WhatIsAWoman an attempt to answer Matt Walsh‘s question

A woman has two definitions these days and here they are (both of the items of this list refer to what would be referred to as, “a woman” in today’s society at least in the US):

    1.  Someone with XX chromosomes who does not satisfy both of the following conditions:

• The person has extreme gender disphoria.
• The person has altered their body so that it has the secondary sex characteristics that are typically present in someone with XY chromosomes.

     2.  Someone with XY chromosomes who has altered their body to resemble someone with the secondary sex characteristics that typically manifest in people with XX chromosomes who has altered their body because they need to do that to feel comfortable in it.

As a side note if that person were to stop feeling gender dysphoria after modifying their body then that person is still no longer a woman according to this definition (which I do feel is an accurate definition but not along strictly biological lines but rather based on of the standards of today’s society) no matter what that person looks like. This seems to not make sense. But it does make sense when you consider the fact that transgenderism is a ruse (not meaning that it’s for a People lying about their feelings, but referring to the idea that most people in society will look at a transgender person, and say, “close enough, even if you have a penis”) that we as a society have agreed to put on because most people in our society have decided that: because there is no effective therapy for extreme gender dysphoria, it’s a reasonable thing to put on this ruse.