Pencil Sharpeners

Many of you remember pencil sharpeners that look like this from your childhood:

Look at that, nice and metal, no flimsy plastic parts, durable and long lasting. In fact, as long as it doesn't get wet, it will outlast you. Now everyone's buying cheap pieces of crap like this worthless piece of shit:
 

And this is made by the same company Xacto, no relation. Now while it may look cool, and while it might be convenient because it's electric, it's not practical for more than one user and it's not practical for —jobs where you have to sharpen several pencils in one session;— it overheats when you do that and there's no cooling fan. And even if you're not using for that, if it's used by everyone in a single office, it will break within 10 days and no one will replace it or even notice it's broken for like a year.

I think they do this stuff on purpose so they can make more money by selling more pencil sharpeners.

Don't Think With Your Skin

Now we're going to talk about race relations because call me an egomaniac, but I think I'm one of the few people who have a good idea of how they should work.  Now first let's go over how most people see race relations, most people see it as, "try your hardest not to be racist because racism is bad."  That idea is a on the right track, but it doesn't exactly hit its mark.  To truly not be racist, you have to embrace —the good ideology of not identifying yourself or others by the color of their skin— instead of the bad and different ideology of thinking that: —everyone with a different skin color from yours— is a good person because if you think otherwise then it makes you racist.

Let me explain, I'm white, but I don't identify as a white person.  This is ONLY because I DON'T THINK THAT MY SKIN COLOR AFFECTS MY PERSONALITY AT ALL.  I am not the best of people and at times I can be a jackass, but when I am a jackass, I'm not a jackass because I'm white; I'm a jackass because of Asperger's Syndrome or because of the situation I'm in or —another reason that has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FACT THAT I'M WHITE.—  Same thing if I was black, if I was black, I'D BE JUST AS MUCH AS A JACKASS AND IT WOULD STILL HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE COLOR OF MY SKIN.

Now let's say for the sake of argument (this is only a hypothetical scenario and not necessarily an accurate representation of any population statistics) that 90% of the population consisted of white PEOPLE and that 10% consisted of black PEOPLE.  If 10% of PEOPLE are black and 90% of PEOPLE are white, —100% of those PEOPLE— are PEOPLE.

Now let's say for the sake of argument (this is only a hypothetical scenario and not necessarily an accurate representation of any population statistics) that __% of the population are PEOPLE are black and the rest are white PEOPLE.  That's not a typo, I've left that number out because: what matters is that in this scenario, everyone is either a white PERSON or a black PERSON, and all of them are PEOPLE.  So no matter what the population statistics are, IT CONSISTS OF 100% PEOPLE.

So why did I go into a big speech about this simple logic?  To remind everyone that your race doesn't define you, you should choose what you want to be like based on your desires on what you want to be like.  If you're a white musician, you don't have to sing country, but you should if you want; if you're a black musician you don't have to sing hip hop, but you should if you want.  And if that last sentence sounds racist, that's because it's supposed to expose the problems behind —the idea of having the moral obligation to sacrifice your identity to avoid feeling like you're enforcing a racial stereotype.—  That's not the right way to think of it; you should do what you want and not try to enforce or try to avoid enforcing racial stereotypes.  Also, don't assume —whether or not people are enforcing or trying to avoid enforcing racial stereotypes— by their actions.  A lot of people happen to coincidentally like doing things that coincide with stereotypes of their race and there's nothing wrong with that.

In closing, I want to say that people should do what they like to do and not define themselves or be defined by the color of their skin.  Remember, you're the same person no matter what color your skin is.  So don't let others use your skin color to define how you should be, only let morals and hopefully good morals define who you are.

More about the fucking autism puzzle piece

I hate that fucking puzzle piece, and not for the same reason that most people do, most people think that the puzzle piece is bed because it conveys that people are incomplete, that is NOT the message that I get from the puzzle piece.  When I see that blue puzzle piece I get the message, "hey everyone, be aware of people who are big babies because of this disorder, be accepting of them not because they're people too, but because they're big babies!"  That's a great message, that Autism makes people pathetic, it doesn't make all people pathetic, it makes some people agitated and annoyed at the fucking world like it does to me.

You know how —the Autism that I have— feels like?  It's like being possessed by a demon that influences your desires so you don't have the willpower to do —the things that contribute to the quality of your lifestyle— and makes you feel like it's your fault.  So let's all symbolize it with a namby-pamby fucking baby blue puzzle piece.

What a wonderful fucking symbol, surely it reminds you of people like me.  Boy I come across like a harmless baby blue puzzle piece don't I?  Just not intimidating at all, just a fucking thing that was so cute when Curious George fucking swallowed it.  And if you fucking tattooed it on your body and you have Autism, you're a fucking dumbass and not because you have Autism, but because you have no self-respect you spineless hole in the shield used in the battle for —the dignity of the people who you've chosen to represent with that tattoo.—  That's a lot, asshole, you're better off as a martyr.

Oh and to those parents who dress their adult autistic children in those fucking shirts saying that Autism acronym that says, "Always Unique Totally Intelligent Sometimes Mysterious," go fuck yourself!  It should say, "I'm sorry, but god burdened me with Autism because I was a fucking asshole in my past life and my parents were in this life."

Ok and another thing, a lot of people with Autism are suffering like me; they're not happy like the blissful blue puzzle piece.  Again, like me, some people are living at 30+ with their parents and hating it and hating the fact that they have to.  Oh and to all those people who made —the Autism that I have— —a worse burden to be than it had to be (except for the ones who were just doing what they were told; I'm just talking about the people who made the bad decisions) (you know who you are,—) why don't you go make up for what you did and send me some fucking money.  Just click the following link to send it via paypal https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=83KB46HVACNW4  I'll probably spend it on some useless crap, but I love money and I don't want any from that one guy who I forgave.

Another Rant About The Autism Puzzle Piece

Ok, let's talk more about the autism puzzle piece because everyone has their dumb analysis, like “oh, it symbolizes that we need to fit together the piece of this illness so it's a big mystery like a puzzle.” I call bullcrap on that, if we're trying to say that autism deserves awareness, then why is the puzzle baby blue like a puzzle for children. Why not just put some baby blocks with alphabet letters while you're at it, we can say it looks like we're building a cure one “block” at a time even though it looks like we're saying, “Awww, it's so cute, little Timmy will never grow up because of his illness, it'll cause extra work for him to not end up living at his parents' basement at 30 like Xaxton!”

Thanks to Autism, my life is messed up but let's make it look cute. While we're at it, why not put some baby blocks around 9/11 footage when memorialize it, won't that make 9/11 look like it's too be taken seriously? It's ok if we say that the block means we're building a foundation to a safer future!

So now you realize the problem with assigning —arbitrary meanings to —symbols that otherwise can look like they mean something else.—  You don't want your kid to have Autism and you don't want to have Autism; Autism is a disorder; we don't want disorders and if we want neurodiversity, then you should use the neurodiversity symbol because it has a rainbow and who doesn't like rainbows?

Look, if we want to use the puzzle piece than we have to make it look serious and to make it look serious, we have to get rid of that wimpy little baby blue color. Make it white with a black outline. Not baby blue. That's like using a pink flower to symbolize feminism, everyone loves flowers cause they're delicate, I'm sure a lot of feminists would love to be called that, especially ones that have just broken the cycle of domestic abuse by a male partner.

The Monty Hall Problem

Ok, this is an explanation of The Monty Hall Problem, so I won't go into what it is just look it up, but here's the express explanation on why you have BETTER probability to win if you switch doors.


So let's go through all of the possibilities, now I know that there are two doors that Monty can choose from to open if on your first pick (when there are three doors,) your door has a car behind it.  So I'm going to split the possibilities of which door he can open into 18 possible outcomes.  In all of these outcomes, I will tell you what happens if you switch.  Remember, in a scenario where switching leads to victory, not switching leads to losing.

In our first set of outcomes, Monty can only open the goat door closest to the left, and still HE CAN'T OPEN YOUR DOOR, and HE CAN'T OPEN THE DOOR WITH THE CAR BEHIND IT.  So this example is how our outcomes are gonna work:  In this example I will highlight all the 1s in red, all the 2s in yellow and all the 3s in green

• Outcome set 1

1. If the car is behind door 1 and you pick door 1, he opens door 2 and lets you switch to door 3
2. If the car is behind door 2 and you pick door 2, he opens door 1 and lets you switch to door 3
3. If the car is behind door 3 and you pick door 3, he opens door 1 and lets you switch to door 2

In our second set of outcomes, Monty will always open the goat door closest to the right if the door that you've chosen has the car behind it.

• Outcome set 2:

1. If the car is behind door 1 and you pick door 1, he opens door 3 and lets you switch to door 2
2. If the car is behind door 2 and you pick door 2, he opens door 3 and lets you switch to door 1
3. If the car is behind door 3 and you pick door 3, he opens door 2 and lets you switch to door 1

So before I finally get into out set of outcomes, I'd like to point out that even in our example of scenarios in which you lose if you switch, we have a pattern that doesn't lead to a 50% chance of getting either goat.  Let's assume that you want the goat that's closest to the left, in outcome set 1, you have a 2/3 chance of getting that goat and a 1/3 chance of getting the other.  You have the opposite odds in outcome set 2.  This is important because it means that if we want each goat to have an equal chance of being the goat that we take home, each of the goats has to have a 1/3 chance of being the goat that we go home with if we switch and lose.

So finally here's our set of outcomes:

1. The car is behind door 1:
1. You pick door 1; and Monty opens door 2 and lets you switch ONLY to door 3, YOU SWITCH AND LOSE
2. You pick door 2, and IN THIS SCENARIO, MONTY HAS A 100% CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 3 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 1, YOU SWITCH AND WIN
3. You pick door 3, and IN THIS SCENARIO, MONTY HAS A 100% CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 2 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 1, YOU SWITCH AND WIN
2. The car is behind door 2:
1. You pick door 1; and IN THIS SCENARIO, MONTY HAS A 100% CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 3 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 2, YOU SWITCH AND WIN
2. You pick door 2; and Monty opens door 1 and let's you switch ONLY to door 3, YOU SWITCH AND LOSE
3. You pick door 3; and IN THIS SCENARIO, MONTY HAS A 100% CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 2 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 2, YOU SWITCH AND WIN
3. The car is behind door 3:
1. You pick door 1; and IN THIS SCENARIO, MONTY HAS A 100% CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 2 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 3; YOU SWITCH AND WIN
2. You pick door 2; and IN THIS SCENARIO, MONTY HAS A 100% CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 1 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 3; YOU SWITCH AND WIN
3. You pick door 3; and Monty opens door 1 and let's you switch ONLY to door 2; YOU SWITCH AND LOSE
4. Now before we go on, I'd like to remind everyone that in —each scenario in which switching causes you to lose,— there's a 50% chance of him opening the left most goat door and a 50% chance of him opening the right most goat door.  We have to repeat these results because —each of the scenarios in which the car is not behind your door— is actually two; —one scenario in which if there was a car behind your door, Monty would reveal the left most goat and let you switch to the right most goat,— and —a scenario in which if there was a car behind your door, Monty would reveal the right-most goat and let you twitch to the left-most goat.—  So in the next examples, Monty will now open the right-most goat door if the car is behind —the door that you pick out of 3.—   So now if: The car is behind door 1:
1. You pick door 1; and Monty opens door 3 and lets you switch ONLY to door 2; YOU SWITCH AND LOSE, I want to point out here that this is the first in a set of scenarios is which Monty the left most door to let you switch to and YOU STILL LOSE if you switch.
2. You pick door 2; and IN THIS SCENARIO MONTY HAS A 100% OF OPENING DOOR 3 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 1; YOU SWITCH AND WIN, now some of you are saying that I'm making the odds uneven by listing the winning scenarios twice, but IT DOESN'T MATTER WHICH GOAT MONTY LETS ME SWITCH TO, NEITHER GOAT IS A CAR, so if I have to list —the scenarios in which I switch to a goat— twice, I have to listed —the scenarios in which I switch to a car— twice.
3. You pick door 3; and IN THIS SCENARIO, MONTY HAS A 100% CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 2 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 1; YOU SWITCH AND WIN
5. So let's just recap what we've learned so far, for —the scenario in which the car is behind door 1:— we've already established 6 possibilities; in our first set, Monty will reveal the left goat and let you switch to the right goat if you pick door 1.  In our second set, Monty will reveal the right goat and let you switch to the left goat if you pick door 1.  So it's a 2/6 chance that switching will cause you to lose, and because we have to double the other possibilities as well, it's 4/6 that switching will cause you to win.  2/6 equals 1/3 and 4/6 equals 2/3, the odds of winning if you switch, and that trend will continue when we go to what happens if: The car is behind door 2:
1. You pick door 1; and IN THIS SCENARIO MONTY HAS A 100% CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 3 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 2; YOU SWITCH AND WIN
2. You pick door 2; and Monty opens door 3 and lets you switch ONLY to door 1; YOU SWITCH AND LOSE
3. You pick door 3; and IN THIS SCENARIO MONTY HAS A 100& CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 1 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 2; YOU SWITCH AND WIN
6. The car is behind door 3:
1. You pick door 1; and IN THIS SCENARIO MONTY HAS A 100% CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 2 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 3; YOU SWITCH AND WIN
2. You pick door 2; and IN THIS SCENARIO MONTY HAS A 100% CHANCE OF OPENING DOOR 1 AND LETTING YOU SWITCH TO DOOR 3; YOU SWITCH AND WIN
3. You pick door 3: and Monty opens door 2 and lets you switch to door 2; YOU SWITCH AND LOSE

If you hit control+F on this page and type the words, "YOU SWITCH AND WIN," you will see 13 matches including this example, that's 12/18 possibilities, 12/18=2/3  In all 18 possibilities, —whether Monty wants to reveal the left goat when he has a choice or when he wants to reveal the right goat when he has a choice— doesn't matter because when Monty has a choice of which goat to reveal, you lose.  But there's only a 1/3 chance the Monty will have a choice of which goat to reveal and no matter which goat he reveals, if Monty had a choice of which goat to reveal and you switch, you lose.  There's a 2/3 chance that Monty can ONLY reveal 1 goat, and that's more likely and that probably happened without out knowing it so it doesn't matter that there are two doors after one is eliminated because there's a 2/3 chance that you've forced Monty to tell you which door the car is behind, and when you've forced Monty to reveal which door the car is behind, it's behind the door that you end up switching to if you decided to switch.  If you decide to switch, you're NOT choosing out of the two remaining doors that you didn't pick when there were 3, when you choose to switch, you're choosing to win the car if there's a goat behind the door you picked when all 3 doors were closed, and there's a 2/3 chance of picking —a door with a goat behind it— when all 3 doors are closed.  When you switch, you're turning a 2/3 chance of losing into a 2/3 chance of winning.

TheLegend27

Oh boy do I love TheLegend27, boy isn't it a great commercial?  I'm so glad that my youtube videos got interrupted so I could watch a bunch of boring cunts talk about some other boring cunt!  Boy is it sooooooooooo great that anyone had to sit through that shit.  It's so great in fact, that it deserves for everyone to repeat it for free and give the company free advertising by turning it into a meme.

Aren't you mainstream sheep cunts great?  You should be so proud of yourselves!  You turned something annoying and spreaded it like a cancer on the internet and embraced it.  I bet if I followed one of you assholes around for at least a month yelling, "go to Xaxton Revolution's youtube channel several times," none of you would!

So that's right go ahead, be dumb little sheeple, keep repeating the marketing slogan, help a company get rich while you get nothing in return.  You should feel great for what you've done, the internet is sooooooo much better because of you.